Skip to content
StepShown

Am I better off renting or buying?

Compare what each choice may leave you with after the same number of years. The model counts upkeep, selling costs, and money the renter could invest.

Loading your saved values and results

How this tool was checked

Sources and review

Expert review is still needed

StepShown checked the calculation code and its tests. An independent expert in this subject has not checked it yet. Use it to plan, and ask a qualified professional before making an important decision.

Calculation version
Version 1.1
Last updated
Person responsible
StepShown engineering
  • Decide how much you want to spend on a home

    Published by Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Area covered: United States. StepShown owner: StepShown editorial. Checked . Check again by . Budgeting from a total monthly housing payment before solving for principal and interest. Reference guidance; no date specific value is ingested.

  • When can I remove private mortgage insurance from my loan?

    Published by Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Area covered: United States. StepShown owner: StepShown editorial. Checked . Check again by . The distinction between requesting borrower paid PMI cancellation at 80% of original value and scheduled automatic termination at 78%, including eligibility conditions and loan type limits. Reference guidance; no date specific value is ingested.

Location planning

48 state guides show a large enough change to affect the answer.

Browse the location guides

Read the StepShown calculation and writing rules, or report a problem.

Learn more

How the comparison works

The usual version of this question sets a rent cheque beside a mortgage payment and declares the smaller one better. That is not a comparison because it ignores the deposit, the upkeep, the cost of selling, and the fact that a renter’s unspent money can be invested.

Here, both paths have exactly the same cash available every month. The renter begins by investing the deposit and buying costs the buyer just handed over. In any month where owning would cost more, the renter invests the difference; where renting costs more, the buyer invests the difference. Neither side gets to be richer simply because its housing bill is lower.

If you buy
sale price minus selling costs minus remaining loan, plus months when owning costs less, invested
If you rent
the renter’s portfolio: deposit and buying costs, plus every month renting costs less, compounded
The answer
whichever is larger at the year you sell

Mortgage interest deductibility is deliberately excluded. It depends on whether you itemise, your bracket, and caps that change over time; applying one assumption to everybody would mislead more people than it helped. If itemising genuinely beats the standard deduction for you, the real answer tilts a little further toward buying.

Conventional PMI paid by the borrower is carried to the original amortization schedule’s 78% automatic termination baseline. The model does not assume appreciation causes early cancellation, because a borrower request, payment history, property evidence and lender requirements can matter. FHA, VA and lender paid insurance follow different rules.

One honest warning. The result depends on two numbers nobody knows: how fast the home appreciates and what the invested money earns. Move each by a point before trusting the verdict. If the answer flips easily, the truthful conclusion is that it is close. When it is close, how long you will stay decides it.

Common questions

How is this comparison actually made?

Both choices get the same starting cash and the same monthly budget. The renter invests the down payment and buying costs that were not spent. After that, whichever choice has the lower housing cost invests the difference. At the end, the buyer has money from selling the home plus investments. The renter has investments. This is fairer than comparing only rent with the mortgage payment.

Why does buying take so long to win?

Because the costs of buying arrive early and the benefits accrue slowly. You pay several percent of the price to get in and several more to get out, early mortgage payments are almost entirely interest, and upkeep runs continuously. Equity builds slowly at first and quickly later, which is why the crossing point often sits well past the five years people expect.

Is 1% a year realistic for maintenance?

It is a common planning figure and a reasonable middle estimate for a typical detached home. Older properties, larger properties and those with significant land tend to cost more; a newly built home may cost less in its first years and more later. It is not optional spending; deferred maintenance is a cost taken later, usually with interest.

Does this include the tax treatment of mortgage interest?

No. Deductibility depends on whether you itemise, your bracket, local rules and caps that change over time, and applying a single assumption would mislead more people than it helped. If itemising is genuinely worth more to you than the standard deduction, the real result tilts somewhat further toward buying than shown here.

What if I would not actually invest the difference?

Then renting performs worse than this model suggests, and the comparison tilts toward buying. The renting case depends entirely on the money not spent on the house being invested rather than absorbed into spending. A mortgage is a forced savings plan; that behavioural advantage is real, and it is not captured by arithmetic.

Which single input matters most?

How long you stay. It moves the answer more than the interest rate, the price, or the rent. Everything about buying is designed to reward duration, which is why the honest version of this question is not "can I afford to buy" but "am I confident I will still be here in several years".

Where to go next

If buying wins, the next two questions are what it costs each month and what it takes to get to the table.

Or browse everything in Home Ownership.

Rent vs. Buy: Am I better off renting or buying right now? · StepShown